Agent Application DevelopmentAccount
Knowledge catalogChoose core direction and segmented content
Practice 22IntermediateSystem designAbout 12 minutes

Corresponding knowledge: Evidence support, partial answers, and calibrated abstention

RAG quoted the document but is still talking nonsense. How to judge whether to answer or refuse to answer?

Examine the sufficiency of evidence, item-by-item citation, conflict resolution and rejection calibration.

Groundingrefuse to answerQuote

Knowledge content check2026-10-03 · Check the source of the original question2026-10-02

Knowledge unit directory

LEARN · PRACTICE · REFLECT

Knowledge exercises·Independent answers

My notes and review ↗

Principles and Solutions have been collapsed. Explain the core mechanism, boundaries and verification methods in your own words, and then compare them.

Answers and personal notes

Each modified commit will be kept as an independent history. Your level of mastery is up to you to evaluate yourself against the standards.

Explain in your own words first

The core principles, analysis, Q&A and migration cases have been closed. When you are ready, unfold it and compare it with the content to find any omissions.

Hands-on verificationComplete on demand · Suggestions15 minutes

Provide two paragraphs of evidence for the three claims, mark support, contradictions and deficiencies, and write a final reply.

Expand acceptance requirements and checkpoints
  • Claims that are not supported will not be forced to answer
  • Conflict has origin and time
  • Known parts can still be clearly delivered

Key inspections

  • Distinguish between relevance and support
  • Evaluate the two types of losses: forced answer and refused answer
  • Handle conflicts, timeliness, and citation permissions