Agent Application DevelopmentAccount
Knowledge catalogChoose core direction and segmented content
Practice 55AdvancedSystem designAbout 18 minutes

Corresponding knowledge: Bind code changes to acceptance evidence

Design a R&D Agent that can modify old Java systems and submit PRs. How will you limit risks?

Examine code base understanding, isolation execution, acceptance, regression and manual review.

Coding AgentJavaPR

Knowledge content check2026-10-03 · Check the source of the original question2026-10-02

Knowledge unit directory

LEARN · PRACTICE · REFLECT

Knowledge exercises·Independent answers

My notes and review ↗

Principles and Solutions have been collapsed. Explain the core mechanism, boundaries and verification methods in your own words, and then compare them.

Answers and personal notes

Each modified commit will be kept as an independent history. Your level of mastery is up to you to evaluate yourself against the standards.

Explain in your own words first

The core principles, analysis, Q&A and migration cases have been closed. When you are ready, unfold it and compare it with the content to find any omissions.

Hands-on verificationComplete on demand · Suggestions15 minutes

Design task contracts, tool permissions, failure reproduction and PR acceptance for Java duplicate deduction issues.

Expand acceptance requirements and checkpoints
  • Reproducible failure on old code
  • New tests cannot be circumvented by deleting
  • Unauthorized deployment will not occur

Key inspections

  • Tasks are acceptable and change scope is controlled
  • Test evidence binding code version
  • Clear boundaries between PR and merge deployment