Agent Application DevelopmentAccount
Knowledge catalogChoose core direction and segmented content
Practice 40IntermediateSystem designAbout 12 minutes

Corresponding knowledge: Independent and representative evaluation samples

How to build a credible Agent review set when there are only 30 good-looking demos?

Examine task sampling, failure coverage, data leakage and annotation quality.

Learn corresponding knowledgeInterview questions · Answer independently →
Eval DatasetReturndata leakage

Knowledge content check2026-10-03 · Check the source of the original question2026-10-02

The knowledge corresponding to this exercise:

Agent evaluation: outcomes, constraints, and evidence · Hierarchical deep learning →
Knowledge unit directory

LEARN · PRACTICE · REFLECT

Knowledge exercises·Independent answers

My notes and review ↗

Principles and Solutions have been collapsed. Explain the core mechanism, boundaries and verification methods in your own words, and then compare them.

Answers and personal notes

Each modified commit will be kept as an independent history. Your level of mastery is up to you to evaluate yourself against the standards.

Explain in your own words first

The core principles, analysis, Q&A and migration cases have been closed. When you are ready, unfold it and compare it with the content to find any omissions.

Hands-on verificationComplete on demand · Suggestions15 minutes

Design 12 evaluation sample quotas for enterprise research agents to illustrate various types of failure coverage.

Expand acceptance requirements and checkpoints
  • Contains permissions and tool failures
  • Each question has a judged acceptance
  • Debugging and Reserved Set Isolation

Key inspections

  • Stratified sampling by business and risk
  • The initial state of the task and acceptance can be reproduced
  • Prevent development test leaks